Defining Properly Collected Urine: Thresholds to Improve the Accuracy of Urinalysis for Microscopic Hematuria Evaluation in Women.

PURPOSE: Microscopic hematuria is one of the most common office consults for urologists. While revised guidelines have risk-stratified patients to reduce unnecessary screening, they do not provide guidance concerning specimen quality. We sought to define "properly collected" specimens using catheterized urine samples as a reference to improve the utility of hematuria screening in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively acquired same-visit voided and catheterized urine samples from 46 women referred for microscopic hematuria from September 2016 to March 2020. Characteristics of pre-referral urinalysis were compared to the matched specimens. True microscopic hematuria was defined as ≥3 red blood cells per high power field on catheterization. RESULTS: Catheterized urinalyses had significantly fewer red blood and squamous epithelial cells in comparison to both referral urinalyses (p=0.006, p=0.001, respectively) and same-day void urinalyses (p=0.02, p=0.04, respectively). As no catheterized sample had >2 squamous epithelial cells, we applied this squamous epithelial cell threshold to referral urinalyses for analysis. Addition of this criterion for "properly collected specimen" increased the positive predictive value of referral urinalyses from 46.1% to 68.8% for true microscopic hematuria. Fewer than 2 squamous epithelial cells with elevated RBC was a significant predictor for true microscopic hematuria (p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Voided specimens in the urology clinic had significantly lower red blood cells than referral samples, indicating improved collection technique may reduce false positive urinalyses. Matched collection suggested that repeat collection by catheterization in women who present with >2 squamous epithelial cells per high power field on referral urinalysis may prevent unnecessary future work-up.

INCIDENCE OF URINARY TRACT INFECTION AFTER CYSTOGRAPHY.

OBJECTIVE: Cystography an invasive procedure with potential complications such as urinary infection (UI). There are few studies about the incidence of complications associated with this procedure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the incidence of post-cystography urinary infection (UI.). METHODS: Retrospective study with a review of clinical records of patients under 15 years of age, followed in this hospital, who underwent cystography (radiologic or indirect radionuclide) between 2009 and 2018. Post-cystography UI was defined when it occurred until seven days after the procedure. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were applied to assess possible predictive factors related with post-cystography UI. RESULTS: In the study period, 531 cystograms were undertaken (55% indirect radionuclide and 45% radiologic). The mean age at the procedure was 11.5 months; 62% were boys. Every patient had a previous negative urine culture; 50% were under antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of the procedure. The most common indication for the procedure was the post-natal study of congenital hydronephrosis/other nephrological malformation (53%), followed by the study of febrile UI (31%). Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was diagnosed in 40% of procedures. Post-cystography UI occurred in 23 cases (incidence of 4.3%). The most frequent microorganism was E. coli (52%). The presence of VUR was significantly associated with the occurrence of post-cystography IU. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of post-cystography UI was low in our sample. The presence of VUR was significantly associated with the occurrence of post-cystography UI. The authors highlight the importance of an adequate catheterization technique and the need for clinical surveillance after the procedure.

Impact of an evidence-based intervention on urinary catheter utilization, associated process indicators, and infectious and non-infectious outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Multi-centre intervention studies tackling urinary catheterization and its infectious and non-infectious complications are lacking. AIM: To decrease urinary catheterization and, consequently, catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and non-infectious complications. METHODS: Before/after non-randomized multi-centre intervention study in seven hospitals in Switzerland. Intervention bundle consisting of: (1) a concise list of indications for urinary catheterization; (2) daily evaluation of the need for ongoing catheterization; and (3) education on proper insertion and maintenance of urinary catheters. The primary outcome was urinary catheter utilization. Secondary outcomes were CAUTIs, non-infectious complications and process indicators (proportion of indicated catheters and frequency of catheter evaluation). FINDINGS: In total, 25,880 patients were included in this study [13,171 at baseline (August-October 2016) and 12,709 post intervention (August-October 2017)]. Catheter utilization decreased from 23.7% to 21.0% (P=0.001), and catheter-days per 100 patient-days decreased from 17.4 to 13.5 (P=0.167). CAUTIs remained stable at a low level with 0.02 infections per 100 patient-days (baseline) and 0.02 infections (post intervention) (P=0.98). Measuring infections per 1000 catheter-days, the rate was 1.02 (baseline) and 1.33 (post intervention) (P=0.60). Non-infectious complications decreased significantly, from 0.79 to 0.56 events per 100 patient-days (P<0.001), and from 39.4 to 35.4 events per 1000 catheter-days (P=0.23). Indicated catheters increased from 74.5% to 90.0% (P<0.001). Re-evaluations increased from 168 to 624 per 1000 catheter-days (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: A straightforward bundle of three evidence-based measures reduced catheter utilization and non-infectious complications, whereas the proportion of indicated urinary catheters and daily evaluations increased. The CAUTI rate remained unchanged, albeit at a very low level.

Urine drainage management in colorectal surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery programs (ERP) is aimed at reducing a patient's surgical stress response, specifically by reducing the duration of catheterization. In cases of colorectal surgery, there is pronounced heterogeneity in urinary catheterization, which is largely explained by fear of acute urinary retention (AUR). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the work is to report on the current literature on postoperative urinary catheterization following colorectal surgery, particularly with regard to the risk of AUR, and thereby contribute to the standardization of perioperative practices. RESULTS: In colon surgery without preoperative urinary disorders, catheterization must not exceed 24h. In rectal surgery, catheter removal starting on postoperative D2 seems reasonable in the absence of AUR risk factor (RF). Male sex, past history of lower urinary tract obstruction, abdomino-perineal amputation (APA) and low rectal anastomosis are AUR risk factors that must be taken into account when deciding to withdraw the urinary catheter. While the role of a suprapubic catheter is not clearly defined, it may be of use following APA. The epidural catheter is another AUR risk factor, but it seems possible to withdraw the urinary catheter on postoperative D1, before the epidural catheter, provided that the other risk factors have been taken into full account. Lastly, up until now no satisfactorily conducted study has assessed the prophylactic value of systematic perioperative alpha-blocker treatment in colorectal surgery.

Improving urinary catheterisation practices in a rural hospital in Ontario.

INTRODUCTION: A urinary catheter constitutes a one-point patient restraint, can induce deconditioning and may lead to patient mortality. An audit performed at Winchester District Memorial Hospital revealed that 20% of patients had a urinary catheter, of whom 31% did not meet the criteria for catheterisation. The main objective of this study was to use the Influencer Change Model and the Choosing Wisely Canada toolkit to create a bundle of interventions that would reduce the unnecessary use of urinary catheters in hospitalised patients. METHODS: In a rural teaching hospital, a time-series quasi-experiment was employed to decrease inappropriate use of urinary catheters. Both the Choosing Wisely Canada toolkit for appropriate use of urinary catheters and the Influencer change management approach were used to create effective interventions. RESULTS: This study revealed that there was no improvement in appropriate urinary catheter use during Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle 1. There was gradual improvement during PDSA cycle 2, with the percentage of inappropriate urinary catheter use dropping from an initial 31% before any interventions to less than 5% by the end of this study. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: This study aimed to reduce the inappropriate use of urinary catheters in a rural hospital with limited resources. The findings indicate that by using a change model, such as the Influencer Change Model, it is possible to promote better patient care through empowering healthcare staff to implement accepted protocols more stringently and thereby to decrease the inappropriate use of urinary catheters to 0%.

Using appropriateness criteria to identify opportunities to improve perioperative urinary catheter use.

BACKGROUND: The Michigan Appropriate Perioperative (MAP) criteria provide guidance regarding urinary catheter use. For Category A (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy), B (e.g., hemicolectomy), and C (e.g., abdominoperineal resection) procedures, recommendations are to avoid catheter, remove POD 0 or 1, and remove POD 1-4, respectively. We applied MAP criteria to statewide registry data to identify improvement targets. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of risk-adjusted catheter use and duration for appendectomy, cholecystectomy, and colorectal resections in 2014-2015 from 64 Michigan hospitals. RESULTS: 5.5% of 13,032 Category A cases used urinary catheters, including 26.9% of open appendectomies. 94.5% of 1,624 Category B cases used catheters (31.2% remained after POD 1). 98.3% of 700 Category C cases used catheters (4.6% remained POD5+). Variation in duration of use persisted after risk adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative urinary catheter use was appropriate for most simple abdominal procedures, but duration of use varied in all categories.

Accuracy of Bladder Scanner for the Assessment of Postvoid Residual Volumes in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of the bladder scanner in assessing postvoid residual (PVR) volumes in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). METHODS: We performed a prospective parallel cohort study evaluating the accuracy of the BVI 3000 bladder scanner in patients with POP. Patients with POP to the hymen were offered inclusion. Primary outcome was the absolute difference between bladder scanner and catheterization PVR. We also investigated the effect of prolapse stage on bladder scanner accuracy. A prevoid bladder volume was obtained by bladder scan. Subjects voided volume was then collected. A PVR was obtained by bladder scan, followed by a PVR by catheterization. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, linear regression analysis, and sensitivity/specificity analysis were performed. RESULTS: We enrolled 87 subjects. There was a statistically significant difference between catheter and bladder scan PVR, with an absolute median difference of 20 mL (SD = 37.7), P < 0.001. Linear regression analysis showed a difference between mild and advanced prolapse groups. The regression coefficients of the mild prolapse group and advanced prolapse were 0.91 (confidence interval = 0.75-1.06) and 0.66 (confidence interval = 0.54-0. 78), P = 0.015, respectively, indicating a deterioration of accuracy of the bladder scanner for advanced prolapse. The sensitivity of the bladder scanner identifying catheterized PVR volumes less than 100 mL was 93.7%. For catheter PVRs greater than 100 mL, the specificity of the bladder scanner was 72.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Bladder scanner PVRs are less accurate in advanced prolapse, and PVRs of greater than 100 mL should be confirmed by catheterization.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Standard of Care Recovery for Emergency Cesarean Deliveries at Mbarara Hospital, Uganda.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) expedites return to patient baseline and functional status by reducing surgical trauma, stress, and organ dysfunction. Despite the potential benefits of enhanced recovery protocols, limited research has been done in low-resource settings, where 95% of cesarean deliveries are emergent and could possibly benefit from the application of ERAS protocols. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled trial, mothers delivering by emergency cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to either an ERAS or a standard of care (SOC) recovery arm. Patients in the ERAS arm were treated with a modified ERAS protocol that included modified counseling and education, prophylactic antibiotics, antiemetics, normothermia, restrictive fluid administration, and multimodal analgesia. They also received early initiation of mobilization, feeding, and urethral catheter removal. The primary end point was length of hospital stay. The secondary end points were complications and readmission rates. Mean length of stay in the intervention and control arms were compared using t tests. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 13 (College Station, TX). RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were enrolled in the study, with 80 randomized to each arm. There was a statistically significant shorter length of stay for the ERAS arm compared to SOC, with a difference of -18.5 hours (P < .001, 95% confidence interval [CI], -23.67, -13.34). The incidence of complications of severe pain and headache was lower in the ERAS arm compared to SOC (P = .001 for both complications). However, pruritus was more common in the ERAS arm compared to SOC (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Use of an ERAS protocol for women undergoing emergency cesarean delivery in a low-income setting is feasible and reduces length of hospital stay without generally increasing the complication rate.

Catheter management after benign transurethral prostate surgery: RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Criteria.

OBJECTIVES: To formally assess the appropriateness of different timings of urethral catheter removal after transurethral prostate resection or ablation. Although urethral catheter placement is routine after this common treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), no guidelines inform duration of catheter use. STUDY DESIGN: RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology. METHODS: Using a standardized, multiround rating process (ie, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology), an 11-member multidisciplinary panel reviewed a literature summary and rated clinical scenarios for urethral catheter duration after transurethral prostate surgery for BPH as appropriate (ie, benefits outweigh risks), inappropriate, or of uncertain appropriateness. We examined appropriateness across 4 clinical scenarios (no preexisting catheter, preexisting catheter [including intermittent], difficult catheter placement, significant perforation) and 5 durations (postoperative day [POD] 0, 1, 2, 3-6, or ≥7). RESULTS: Urethral catheter removal and first trial of void on POD 1 was rated appropriate for all scenarios except clinically significant perforations. In this case, waiting until POD 3 was deemed the earliest appropriate timing. Waiting 3 or more days to remove the catheter for patients with or without preexisting catheter needs, or for those with difficult catheter placement in the operating room, was rated as inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS: We defined clinically relevant guidance statements for the appropriateness of urethral catheter duration after transurethral prostate surgery. Given the lack of guidelines and this robust expert panel approach, these ratings may help clinicians and healthcare systems improve the consistency and quality of care for patients undergoing transurethral surgery for BPH.

When guidelines conflict: patient safety, quality of life, and CAUTI reduction in patients with spinal cord injury.

The current Medicare payment structure and some of the recent guidelines aimed at reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections may be generating a financial incentive for the protocolized, systematic removal of indwelling catheters in hospitalized patients-including those with spinal cord injury. This creates a tension with the Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine's clinical practice guidelines for the management of neurogenic bladder. This article presents a series of cases and a discussion of the implications with regard to patient safety and quality of life.

Parental home removal of urethral catheters after urological surgery-a prospective benchmarking study.

INTRODUCTION: Many urological operations require placement of a urethral Foley catheter. The catheter often needs to remain in situ for a period of time after discharge; and patients subsequently require either a further hospital admission or community nurse review for catheter removal. Parents can easily remove the catheter at home by cutting the balloon port. This disrupts the valve and hence deflates the retaining balloon, thereby facilitating spontaneous passage of the catheter. The authors introduced this practice to their institution. AIM: The aim was to assess safety and success of parental home catheter removal. METHODS: A prospective data study was performed in a large pediatric urology center over a 12-month time period. Patients <16 years after single-stage hypospadias repair or other penile surgery were included on a voluntary basis. Parents of eligible patients were instructed verbally and with an information leaflet, including date for removal. Telephone follow-up after removal was undertaken to assess the outcome. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included over a 12-month time period. Patient age ranged from 9 months to 12 years (median age 2.5 years). The majority (82%) of patients had required a catheter after hypospadias repair. Home catheter removal was successful in 92% cases. Three children required professional support for catheter removal. Median time until catheter passage was 3 h (range 0-24 h). Considering that cost for day case admission for catheter removal averages at 130£ per patient, home catheter removal saved the NHS 4550£ in the time period. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to report the safety and feasibility of parental home catheter removal by cutting the balloon port valve in the pediatric population. It offers a number of distinct advantages compared with traditional methods for removal. These include, namely, (i) positive patient experience: catheter removal in a familiar environment by a relative minimizes stressful experiences for the family; (ii) minimal trauma to healing tissues through spontaneous catheter passage; and (iii) health care-related cost savings. This was an initial benchmarking study, so patient numbers were relatively small. Nevertheless, it shows that the method is safe and received positive parental feedback. CONCLUSION: Parental home removal of a urethral catheter is a feasible and safe alternative to catheter removal by a health-care professional. It minimizes parental anxiety and inconvenience related to the catheter removal appointment and allows for significant cost savings.

Practice makes perfect! Patient safety starts in medical school: Do instructional videos improve clinical skills and hygiene procedures in undergraduate medical students?

Introduction: In 2012 safety strategies were defined in five intervention areas to improve patient safety in Austria. Regarding policy development, patient safety should be mandatory part of education of all healthcare sectors, and measures to improve hygiene standards are to be included in organizational development. The aim of this project was to achieve sustained improvement in routine procedures and anchor patient safety in the undergraduate medical curriculum by making online instructional videos on clinical skills and hygiene procedures permanently available as preparation for the first clinical clerkship. Method: Short films explaining how to insert urinary catheters in women and men were produced and provided online. These videos were shown to medical students shortly before the practical Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). After viewing the videos, all of the students were surveyed using an online questionnaire with 15 questions regarding quality and acceptance. The effect of the videos on learning success was determined by the assessment outcome through red cards in the practical exam. A red card for behavior endangering the doctor or others meant zero points and discontinuation of the assessment at that particular OSCE station. Results: A total of 647 students viewed one of the two videos on urinary catheters, 623 responded to the online Moodle questionnaire completly. 551 (85.2%) reported being better able to recall individual steps and procedures, 626 students (96.7%) positively rated the fact that instructional videos were available on the Medical University of Vienna's website. More than half of the respondents (56.6%) were better able to remember critical hygiene practices. The comparison of the assessment outcomes on the OSCE for 2016 and 2013, a year in which the instructional videos were not yet available, shows no significant (chi2=3.79; p>0.05) but a trend towards improvement. The chance of getting a red card in 2013 was 3.36 times higher than in 2016. Conclusion: Even if our study was unable to show significant improvements in the OSCE as a result of viewing the videos, it appears that clearly imparting medical skills and hygiene standards-including in visual form-is still important prior to the first clerkship to ensure the highest level of patient safety possible. The combination of teaching and learning formats, such as videos on online platforms with textbooks or lecture notes, is well suited to increase effectiveness and efficiency in learning. There is a need for further studies to investigate and analyze the effects of instructional videos in more detail.

Implementing Daily Leadership Safety Huddles in a Public Hospital: Bridging the Gap.

BACKGROUND: A Leadership Safety Huddle was instituted in efforts to improve communication and make safety culture a priority at our institution. The Huddle is a transparent, regularly recurring forum of clinical and administrative hospital leaders, in which safety issues and concerns are identified, shared, and swiftly addressed. METHODS: Metrics regarding huddle effectiveness in 3 areas are studied: information technology (IT) services ticket resolution time, bladder catheterization, and one-to-one inpatient monitoring. RESULTS: Analysis revealed effectiveness of the huddle on quality of inpatient care and cost savings. Survey revealed 75% or higher favorable responses to huddle improving communication, transparency, time to resolution of issues, ability to voice concerns, and patient safety. As a result of huddle implementation, metrics showed 46% reduction in IT ticket turnaround time (P = .0001), 28% reduction in non-intensive care unit bladder catheter days (P = .011), and 10% decrease in continuous observations (P = .008), allowing a 24% reduction in cost (P = .001) with quarterly savings of $139 107.00. CONCLUSION: These metrics demonstrate how huddles are instrumental in infusing and sustaining a culture of patient safety in hospitals.

Rehabilitation Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors for Preventing Urinary Tract Infections From Intermittent Catheterization.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to develop and examine the reliability of a survey to assess knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors (KAB) of rehabilitation nurses for preventing urinary tract infections in persons requiring intermittent catheterization. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with principal component analysis. METHODS: Survey development and administration based on national guidelines. FINDINGS: Principal component analysis produced three reliable components of KAB explaining 54.5% of response variance. Results indicate that nurses report adequate knowledge and training. Although the facility had an evidence-based online catheterization procedure, staff reported that the procedure was not helpful nor useable. Twenty-eight percent incorrectly identified the root cause of urinary tract infection, and 45% reported that other nurses always washed their hands. Barriers to using standard intermittent catheterization technique were staff, time, and patient variables. CONCLUSION: The modified survey is a reliable measure of KAB. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The survey assists with identifying knowledge gaps, customizing education, and changing practice.

Accuracy of postvoid residual volumes after vaginal delivery: a prospective equivalence study to compare an automatic scanning device with transurethral catheterization.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Abnormal postvoid residual volumes (PVRV) after delivery are common in daily clinical practice. By using an automatic scanning device, unnecessary catheterizations can be prevented. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of PVRV after vaginal delivery measured by an automatic scanning device through a comparison with transurethral catheterization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational equivalence study was performed in patients who delivered vaginally between June 2012 and May 2017 in three teaching hospitals in The Netherlands. After the first spontaneous void after delivery, postvoid residual volume (PVRV) was measured with a portable automatic scanning device (BladderScan® BVI 9400). Directly afterward, it was measured by catheterization. Correlation between measurements was calculated using Spearman's correlation coefficient and agreement plot. The primary outcome was to validate the correlation between the BladderScan® compared with the gold standard of transurethral catheterization. RESULTS: Data of 407 patients was used for final analysis. Median PVRV as measured by BladderScan® was 380 ml (± 261-0-999 ml) and by catheterization was 375 ml (± 315-1800 ml). Mean difference between measurements was -12.9 ml (± 178 ml). There was a very good correlation between methods (Spearman's rho = 0.82, p < 0.001). Using a cut-ff value of >500 ml, specificity and sensitivity were 85.4 and 85.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BladderScan® (BVI 9400) measures PVRV precisely and reliably after vaginal delivery and should be preferred over catheterization.

Standardisation of perioperative urinary catheter use to reduce postsurgical urinary tract infection: an interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of healthcare-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) has been the focus of a national effort, yet appropriate indications for insertion and removal of urinary catheters (UC) among surgical patients remain poorly defined. METHODS: We developed and implemented a standardised approach to perioperative UC use to reduce postsurgical UTI including standard criteria for catheter insertion, training of staff to insert UC using sterile technique and standardised removal in the operating room and surgical unit using a nurse-initiated medical directive. We performed an interrupted time series analysis up to 2 years following intervention. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who developed postsurgical UTI within 30 days as measured by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). Process measures included monthly UC insertions, removals in the operating room and UC days per patient-days on surgical units. RESULTS: At baseline, 22.5% of patients were catheterised for surgery, none were removed in the operating room and catheter-days per patient-days were 17.4% on surgical units. Following implementation of intervention, monthly catheter removal in the operating room immediately increased (range 12.2%-30.0%) while monthly UC insertion decreased more slowly before being sustained below baseline for 12 months (range 8.4%-15.6%). Monthly catheter-days per patient-days decreased to 8.3% immediately following intervention with a sustained shift below the mean in the final 8 months. Postsurgical UTI decreased from 2.5% (95% CI 2.0-3.1%) to 1.4% (95% CI 1.1-1.9; p=0.002) during the intervention period. CONCLUSIONS: Standardised perioperative UC practices resulted in measurable improvement in postsurgical UTI. These appropriateness criteria for perioperative UC use among a broad range of surgical services could inform best practices for hospitals participating in ACS NSQIP.

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Is Routine Urinary Catheterization Still Mandatory in the Era of Enhanced Recovery?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits and safety of noncatheterization during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy within an enhanced recovery protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective comparative study was carried out of consecutive patients who underwent a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy between February 2015 and December 2017 within an early recovery program. The patients who received a urinary catheter were compared with those who did not in terms of postoperative complications, acute urinary retention rates, urinary tract infection rates, and lengths of hospital stay. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients who followed an early recovery program after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in the study period, 96 received a urinary catheter and 49 did not. There was no significant difference between these 2 groups in terms of the rates of acute urinary retention (3% vs 6%, respectively; P = .393), urinary tract infection (3% vs 2%; P = .707), postoperative complications (14% vs 18%; P = .445), or readmissions within 30 days (8% vs 6%; P = .636). However, patients who did not receive a catheter had shorter initial and total (including readmissions) lengths of hospital stay (respectively 2.16 days vs 2.56 days; P = .058, and 2.27 days vs 3.40 days; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings challenge the routine use of urinary catheterization during robot-assisted partial nephrectomies. Noncatheterization does not seem to increase the risk of postoperative urinary retention. Only catheterizing specific at-risk patients may prove beneficial.

Withholding Urinary Catheters in Children Receiving Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: In some institutions, urinary catheters (UCs) have been placed in all patients receiving opioid patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) because of the increased incidence of urinary retention. Our institutional data demonstrated no UC replacements in 48 children who had PCA for perforated appendicitis who had their catheters removed before discontinuation of the PCA. As part of a quality improvement initiative, we discontinued the practice of requiring UC with PCA for perforated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective list of patients with perforated appendicitis was maintained. Data were gathered regarding 60 consecutive patients. UC placement was allowed for specific indications including urinary retention and surgeon discretion. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (27%) received a UC with 14 of these being placed in the operating room (OR). Two UCs were placed outside the OR for urinary retention. Patients who underwent UC placement in the OR weighed significantly more than those who did not (33 versus 42 kg, P = 0.05). No patients required replacement of the catheter once removed. There were no postoperative urinary tract infections. Median PCA duration was 68 h (50, 98) for patients with UC placed in the OR compared with 60 h (47, 78) (P = 0.42). Median postoperative length of stay for patients with UC placed in the OR was 95 h (76, 140) compared with 90 h (70, 113) (P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: UC can be withheld from patients with perforated appendicitis who are placed on PCA with a very low placement rate. UC placement at time of operation did not lengthen time receiving PCA or length of stay.

Implementing a Nurse-Driven Protocol to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the second most common health care-associated infection. CAUTIs represent a serious threat to chronic critically ill patients in long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs). Evidence-based guidelines have been shown to reduce the risk of infection in acute care settings but are not well documented in LTACHs. METHOD: An evidence-based urinary catheter protocol was developed and implemented across three units in a large LTACH. RNs were oriented to the new protocol through online educational modules. During the evaluation period, 120 patients were admitted with a urinary catheter who qualified for chart review for CAUTI incidence. Overall catheter-days and CAUTI rates were compared, and changes in practice were noted. RESULTS: After the education intervention, overall urinary catheter-days decreased by 10.1%, and CAUTI incidence decreased by 74% (4.82 CAUTI per 1,000 patient-days to 1.24). The absolute risk reduction was 3.58 infections per 1,000 catheter-days. The findings were statistically significant (z = 1.00, p < .03). CONCLUSION: Significant reductions were noted in total catheter-days, and CAUTI rates improved after implementation of an education program and an evidence-based urinary catheter protocol in an LTACH. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2018;49(8):372-377.